Last week, the Supreme Court issued their long awaited and highly anticipated decision in Google v. Oracle, which had been pending for a decade. In the 6-2 decision for Google, the Court ruled that Google’s use of Oracle’s code was Fair Use, reversing the Federal Circuit’s decision and allowing Google to escape the infringement allegations by Oracle.

The Case

The case centered around the Android operating system designed by Google in their first foray into the smartphone arena. In the coding, Google used 11,000 lines of the Java SE platform coding for common interface commands. Oracle, the current owner of the Java SE platform, filed suit on the basis that the use of the lines constituted infringement. While a jury found them to be “fair use”, the Federal Circuit disagreed, reversing the decision, and leading the case to the Supreme Court.

The Court granted certiorari on the following two questions:

(1) Whether copyright protection extends to a software interface; and

(2) whether, as the jury found, the petitioner’s use of a software interface in the context of creating a new computer program constitutes fair use.

The Decision

Oral Arguments were heard last fall, leading to the decision issued here. The decision was authored by Justice Breyer and joined by Justices Roberts, Gorsuch, Kavanaugh, Sotomayor, and Kagan. Justice Thomas was joined by Justice Alito in his dissenting opinion. Justice Barrett had not yet joined the Court and accordingly did not play a role in the case.

The majority did not rule on the first issue of whether copyright protection extends to software interface, opting instead to focus on the second issue, where they ruled with the jury that Google’s use of a software interface in creating a new computer program was fair use. This determination upheld Google’s infringement defense, and eliminated Oracle’s infringement claims and potential damages. By skipping to the second question on the assumption that the code was protectable, the Court arrived at the same result that would have come from their determination in the first issue.

In his dissent, Justice Thomas objected to this majority’s assumption of copyrightability and performed the full analysis. He concluded that it was copyrightable, but only because it was specifically limited to exact functions, not merely the abstract use of declaring code. Thomas then did his own Fair Use analysis, finding three of the four factors favored Oracle over Google, and believed this was not an example of Fair Use.

Conclusion

While there are considerable aspects of copyright law which may be affected by this decision, the impacts could have even broader implications. Despite the 6-2 split, all 8 of the Justices found compelling interests in the importance of IP protection for software. That shared belief could prove crucial if the Court is to take up the Abstract Idea §101 issue for patent law and its application to software interfaces and diagnostics.

If you have any questions about how this may affect your IP interests, please reach out to an attorney here.

The Maier & Maier litigation team recently secured the dismissal of another patent infringement suit that had been brought against its client. Last month, District Judge Tanya Walton Pratt dismissed patent infringement claims brought by Plaintiff Thomas A. Person against Cigar Reserve LLC and its owners, Brian and Chanda Kurland.

In October 2020, Mr. Person filed a Complaint in the Southern District of Indiana alleging infringement of two patents relating to cigar spills. The first was a utility patent, U.S. Pat. No. 8,507,070, entitled “Cedar spill,” and the second was a design patent, U.S. Pat. D664,292 entitled “Cedar Spill for a Cigar.” The complaint demanded trebled damages along with injunctive relief from Cigar Reserve and the Kurlands.

The Maier & Maier litigation team was able to defend Cigar Reserve and its owners from the Plaintiff’s demands and helped them come to a favorable resolution of the case. Cigar Reserve joins Maier & Maier’s constantly growing list of happy clients that have obtained favorable rulings thanks to the firm’s team of expert patent litigators that litigate at cost effective and efficient rates.

With another resolution for their client, Maier & Maier continues its string of successful representations in contentious matters, earning favorable results in district court, at the PTAB, and before the ITC. If you or your company need similar assistance, please contact Maier & Maier’s litigation team here.

On March 31^st, the conclusion of Women’s History Month, the USPTO concluded its annual Women’s Entrepreneurship Symposium. Each year since 2011, the USPTO has honored diverse panels of successful women innovators, notable inventors, and experts and welcomed them to share their stories of overcoming adversity on their way to success.

As part of the symposium, the USPTO highlights important subjects, issues, and solutions including the expansion of roles for women and other underrepresented groups in STEM, innovation, and economic growth

The final panel included Janeya Griffin, Founder and CEO, The Commercializer; Rea Huntley, Founder and CEO, Lavii INC; and Sarah Gibson Tuttle, Founder and CEO, Oliver and June. Together, they discussed the importance of protecting your IP assets, the ways they identify those assets and opportunities for growth, and other such strategies that have keyed their success in todays business climate.

Maier & Maier makes concerted and consistent efforts to promote the growing role of women and minorities, and assist those clients in overcoming the challenges they face in the world of IP. If you need such assistance, we urge you to reach out to us here,so we may continue to do our part as the USPTO continues to strive towards equality and an equitable future for innovation.

As part of January 15, 2021, the USPTO will discontinue the First Action Interview Pilot Program that’s been in place for the past twelve years. The program allows practitioners to conduct an interview with the examiner prior to the first office action. This interview is held after the examiner’s preliminary prior art search and allows the practitioner to submit amendments prior to the first action response to the prior art and discussion.

As the USPTO explains;

Under the Full First Action Interview Pilot Program, an applicant is entitled to a first action interview, upon request, prior to the first Office action on the merits. The examiner will conduct a prior art search and provide applicant with a condensed pre-interview communication citing relevant prior art and identifying proposed rejections or objections. Within 30 days of receipt, applicant schedules an interview and submits proposed amendments and/or arguments. At the interview, the relevant prior art, proposed rejections, amendments and arguments will be discussed. If agreement is not reached, the applicant will receive a first action interview Office action that includes an interview summary that constitutes a first Office action on the merits under 35 USC 132.

In their announcement, the USPTO cited the low (0.2%) usage rate as the primary reason for the termination. This low usage stands in stark contrast to the rising rate of interview usage overall, with the peak coming this past October at 38.1%.

This increased interview use is with good cause, as Maier & Maier’s practitioners have had significant success using interviews to get favorable outcomes for our clients. The firm’s office is located just blocks away from the USPTO Headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, providing easy access to in-person interviews.

If you have any questions about interviews or would like to take advantage of this program before it ends on January 15, 2021, please contact us here.

As part of the U.S. Federal Government’s response to Covid-19, the USPTO announced programs to prioritize Covid-19 related patent and trademark applications this past May and June respectively. Since this summer, applicants were permitted to apply for special status without the normal payment requirements for special status.

Thus far, the USPTO has ushered in nearly 400 such applications with 251 patent requests and 133 trademark petitions granted. Of the patent applications, most target medical treatments, vaccines, and diagnostic technology. The remaining make claims on ventilators, personal protective equipment (PPE), and other similar technology.  The program has resulted in 33 granted patents already related to combatting Covid-19.

“Our staff is working very hard to move COVID-19 related patent and trademark requests, ensuring the intellectual property system is fully responsive to this national emergency,” said Andrei Iancu, Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property and Director of the USPTO. “Over the past two centuries, solutions to some of the nation’s greatest problems have passed through the halls of the USPTO, and it’s very likely that some of the solutions to America’s current pandemic have already been examined by this agency.”

The success of these programs reflects the monumental efforts made by the USPTO in its Covid-19 response, as we’ve covered throughout.

Maier & Maier has embraced these programs to assist our clients and help combat the ongoing virus. If you have any questions or concerns about the pilot or how it may apply to your applications, please reach out to us here.